Msg#: 477 *TEXTASY*
12-16-93 07:59:44
From: LYNN ELIZABETH CRAWFORD
To: JOSEFINA AYERZA (Rcvd)
Subj: REPLY TO MSG# 256 (EVERYTHING STARTS WIT)
Lost and is replaced by...?
<*>Replies
Msg#: 518 *TEXTASY*
12-20-93 03:26:41
From: JOSEFINA AYERZA
To: LYNN ELIZABETH CRAWFORD (Rcvd)
Subj: REPLY TO MSG# 477 (EVERYTHING STARTS WIT)
replaced by the plus-of-jouissance which can only be recuparated as long as you
loose the initial one.
Msg#: 533 *TEXTASY*
12-22-93 18:21:54
From: LYNN ELIZABETH CRAWFORD
To: JOSEFINA AYERZA (Rcvd)
Subj: REPLY TO MSG# 518 (EVERYTHING STARTS WIT)
I love this idea of plus. It is excess somehow, but also it never appears
unless it is recuperated as you say. Right?
Msg#: 512 *TEXTASY*
12-18-93 18:52:19
From: LYNN ELIZABETH CRAWFORD
To: LYNN ELIZABETH CRAWFORD (Rcvd)
Subj: TEXT
Josefina, I have been meaning to ask you...the text Lacan uses is speech (not
gesture, clothes, smell...); could an analytic text ever be writing? SAy, for
example, could you perform analysis over the modem using the words written in
place of a physical session when words are spoken?
<*>Replies
Msg#: 519 *TEXTASY*
12-20-93 03:48:08
From: JOSEFINA AYERZA
To: LYNN ELIZABETH CRAWFORD (Rcvd)
Subj: REPLY TO MSG# 512 (TEXT)
I tend to think that the physical presence of the analyst is crutial to the
treatment. How to do without the analyst's voice? Also, when you write you
correct. It's not the same--a slip of the tongue, than a slip in writing.
However, something may be done, specially when the writing is
colloquial. That is when you converse online...
With this system of messages we have had very funy cases...
Msg#: 531 *TEXTASY*
12-22-93 18:18:36
From: LYNN ELIZABETH CRAWFORD
To: JOSEFINA AYERZA (Rcvd)
Subj: REPLY TO MSG# 519 (TEXT)
And now they even have voice activated computers so your voice, spoken into an
apparatus, appears o print.
Msg#: 516 *TEXTASY*
12-19-93 14:43:54
From: RENEE MCPHAIL
To: LYNN ELIZABETH CRAWFORD (Rcvd)
Subj: STUFF
** Message forwarded by WOLFGANG STAEHLE at 12:46:29 on 12-20-93 **
I don't know if analysis has influenced art, in general, incredibly. I suppose
it has influenced my art making in an indirect way. I would think rather that
art and analysis are influenced by a common source.
Msg#: 532 *TEXTASY*
12-22-93 18:19:59
From: LYNN ELIZABETH CRAWFORD
To: RENEE MCPHAIL (Rcvd)
Subj: REPLY TO MSG# 516 (STUFF)
What do you mean by "analysis"? Psycho? Historical?
Msg#: 611 *TEXTASY*
01-01-94 14:03:31
From: RENEE MCPHAIL
To: LYNN ELIZABETH CRAWFORD (Rcvd)
Subj: REPLY TO MSG# 532 (STUFF)
Psychoanalysis. the more I thought about it, the link between analysis and
writers is not a general connection but rather one that you have developed and
the writers you find interesting have also developed. So, this may not be a
relationship between writing and analysis that is a constant. Your, and in many
cases, my world of writers, or sphere, isn't an adequate world view to base any
general hierarchy on. Certainly not every writer is influenced by studies in
psych/sociology. Some are influenced by mathematics, strangely enough, but very
successfully. Some by whatever else they find intriguing. My surprise at how
many writers are interested in what you are also interested in is now tempered
by how few writers I know. Well, that took alot of effort. My phone bill came
yesterday and I don't know if th Thing and I can continue. We'll see. Happy
New Year, I'll talk to you in person soon.
Msg#: 980 *TEXTASY*
01-10-94 19:27:57
From: JOSEFINA AYERZA
To: ALL
Subj: THE EGO ILLUSION
"Psychoanalysis is the disease that psychoanalysis pretends to heal." From Karl
Kraus.
Does anybody not know Karl Kraus? Wahnfried 94.
Msg#: 1218 *TEXTASY*
01-18-94 01:39:42
From: HUGH HAGGERTY
To: LYNN ELIZABETH CRAWFORD (Rcvd)
Subj: WRITING & COMPUTERS
I say Camille Paglia is the tits.
Msg#: 2181 *TEXTASY*
02-03-94 17:07:40
From: LYNN ELIZABETH CRAWFORD
To: HUGH HAGGERTY (Rcvd)
Subj: REPLY TO MSG# 1218 (WRITING & COMPUTERS)
Kathy Acker describes Paglia as "right wing." Does this fit with tits?
Msg#: 2225 *TEXTASY*
02-04-94 13:40:40
From: SYSOP
To: LYNN ELIZABETH CRAWFORD
Subj: REPLY TO MSG# 2181 (WRITING & COMPUTERS)
Wow! Three one-liners in one month! Let's rename this forum to "Planet
of the Reptiles."
Msg#: 2311 *TEXTASY*
02-06-94 21:04:04
From: HUGH HAGGERTY
To: LYNN ELIZABETH CRAWFORD
Subj: REPLY TO MSG# 2181 (WRITING & COMPUTERS)
You have to see her speak to fully appreciate the tits, right wing or not. I
would refrain from labelling her with the usual old labels. Tits works for me.
Msg#: 2312 *TEXTASY*
02-06-94 21:06:36
From: HUGH HAGGERTY
To: SYSOP (Rcvd)
Subj: REPLY TO MSG# 2225 (WRITING & COMPUTERS)
We are striving to be Henny Youngman, aka God, a reptile, if you must.
Msg#: 2845 *TEXTASY*
02-11-94 16:22:07
From: CAROL BROAD
To: HUGH HAGGERTY (Rcvd)
Subj: REPLY TO MSG# 2311 (WRITING & COMPUTERS)
To whose tits do you refer?
Msg#: 2903 *TEXTASY*
02-14-94 04:13:31
From: HUGH HAGGERTY
To: CAROL BROAD (Rcvd)
Subj: REPLY TO MSG# 2845 (WRITING & COMPUTERS)
The tits is slang. It doesn't refer to anybody's in particular.